Skip to content
Sarah Boone— Case Archive
2024 Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayjury_selectionvoir_direDay 2: Jury Selection - October 15, 2024Jury selection continued with Venire Panels 3 and 4, covering qualifications, hardships, and prior publicity. The court ruled on cause challenges, including language-related excusals and two publicity-related strikes, while some individual follow-ups had no recorded disposition.
← Day 1: Jury Selection2024 Criminal TrialDay 3: Jury Selection →

Day 2: Jury Selection - October 15, 2024

Jury Selection: Hardship Screening, Cause Challenges, and Prior Publicity

Judge Michael Kraynick
23Proceedings
4Pages
0Witnesses
1,981Lines
15Sidebars
Day 2: Jury Selection

Jury selection continued with Venire Panels 3 and 4, covering qualifications, hardships, and prior publicity. The court ruled on cause challenges, including language-related excusals and two publicity-related strikes, while some individual follow-ups had no recorded disposition.

Full day summary

Jury selection continued with Venire Panels 3 and 4. Judge Kraynick outlined an anticipated two-and-a-half-week trial ending on or before November 1 and questioned prospective jurors about language comprehension, scheduling, medical limitations, employment, caregiving, and other hardships. He instructed them against discussing or researching the case and explained that the Information was not evidence and the State bore the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. For Panel 3, the court denied a defense cause challenge concerning possible dental pain. A prospective juror who had briefly seen local news coverage said she had formed no opinion and could weigh courtroom evidence fairly; no cause ruling was announced. For Panel 4, the court released nine prospective jurors on stipulated language-based challenges and confirmed 14 remaining during the cause-challenge review. It denied a hearing-loss challenge at that time, citing microphones and available hearing assistance. Further publicity questioning led to cause strikes for Badges 122 and 274 over concerns about setting aside prior exposure. Badge 4045 clarified that he had seen courtroom news coverage, not the suitcase video, and neither party sought his removal for cause. Badge 192's disposition was not recorded.

1. Panel 3 Voir Dire — Opening Screening and Juror Privacy

Venire Panel 3 was sworn on Day 2, received conduct instructions, and answered Judge Kraynick’s questions about English comprehension and scheduling hardships.

→
Procedural
Session Opening and Voir Dire Preparation
40 lines
Procedural
Venire Panel 3: Oath, Conduct Instructions, and Hardship Screening
464 lines

Judge Kraynick instructed Venire Panel 3 and screened eligibility and hardship concerns, leaving private discussions and several follow-up checks pending.

sidebar
Juror Privacy and Courtroom Camera Coverage
10 lines

Counsel raised concerns that courtroom cameras could discourage prospective jurors from speaking freely and capture counsel-table notes or computer screens.

2. Panel 3 Voir Dire — Cause Challenges, Case Orientation, and Individual Follow-up

Jury selection on Day 2 continued with agreed cause strikes, individual hardship follow-up, and explanations of the charge and burden of proof. Seat 35 was questioned about prior news exposure.

→
jury selection
Venire Panel 3: Privacy Assurance and Cause-Challenge Phase
201 lines

The court resolved cause challenges for Venire Panel 3, denied a dental-hardship challenge, and questioned Juror 16 about work and financial concerns.

sidebar
Sidebar Check for Motions
6 lines

At sidebar, Jay asked whether there was no motion, and defense counsel stated there was none.

Voir Dire
Venire Panel 3: Individual Hardship Follow-up
29 lines

The court continued employer-related follow-up and heard a juror's flooding and mold-allergy hardship. Neither party asked follow-up questions, and no excusal ruling was announced.

sidebar
Stipulated Cause Strike for Badge 92
5 lines

The State requested a for-cause strike, and Henderson stipulated.

Procedural
Venire Badge 92 Discharge and Panel Return
37 lines
sidebar
Seating Discrepancies and Roll Call
9 lines

The judge and counsel discussed discrepancies in expected row seating, including a woman neither could identify.

jury selection
Venire Panel 3: Roll Call and Case Orientation
19 lines

The court released a previously removed prospective juror, explained the murder charge, and identified Juror No. 35's prior video and news exposure.

sidebar
Individual Inquiry of Juror 35
5 lines

The judge proposed removing everyone else to question Juror 35 directly, and both sides agreed.

Voir Dire
Venire Panel 3: Individual Juror Follow-up
64 lines

The juror in Seat 35 described brief news exposure and a family conversation, denied forming opinions, and said she could remain impartial.

sidebar
Panel Instructions and Tentative Resumption Time
9 lines

Neither side made a motion, and the sidebar addressed media instructions and when proceedings would resume.

Procedural
Venire Badge 515 Release and Panel Recall
67 lines

Highlights

Venire Panel 3: Privacy Assurance and Cause-Challenge PhaserulingThe court denied the defense's cause challenge to the juror in Seat 14 over possible future dental pain. During the exchange, the court corrected its attribution of a childcare concern: that concern belonged to Juror No. 11, not Seat 14.

3. Panel 4 Voir Dire — Qualifications, Witness Familiarity, Language, and Ability to Serve

Venire Panel 4 was sworn and screened for familiarity, qualifications, and hardships. Nine jurors were released for language-related cause; private questioning of another juror remained pending.

→
Procedural
Venire Panel 4: Oath, Orientation, and Initial Familiarity Screening
38 lines

Judge Kraynick oriented Venire Panel 4; two prospective jurors recognized the defendant, and another raised a language concern.

sidebar
Morning Statements and Juror 37 Excusal
9 lines

Counsel approved repeating the court’s morning statements and discussed excusing Juror No. 37 for cause.

Voir Dire
Venire Panel 4: Qualification and Witness-Familiarity Screening
451 lines

Judge Kraynick released nine prospective jurors after stipulated language-based cause challenges and screened the remaining panel for hardships and impartiality concerns. Private questioning and other follow-up remained pending.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Language-Based Cause Challenges for Prospective JurorsCounsel stipulated to language-based cause challenges for nine prospective jurors after clarifying which jurors had English-language concerns.
sidebar
Cause Challenges After Ability-to-Serve Questions
5 lines

The court and counsel discussed reviewing cause challenges and possible juror excusals after completing the ability-to-serve portion.

Highlights

Venire Panel 4: Qualification and Witness-Familiarity ScreeningrulingThe State agreed to language-based cause challenges, the defense stipulated, and the court released prospective jurors in Seats 4, 25, 26, 32, 33, 35, 41, 45, and 47.

4. Panel 4 Voir Dire — Cause Challenges, Publicity, and Remaining-Pool Confirmation

Jury selection continued on Day 2 with cause challenges, hearing and medical concerns, and screening for prior publicity. Two prospective jurors were excused after individual publicity follow-up; other follow-up ended without a recorded disposition.

→
jury selection
Venire Panel 4: Cause-Challenge Phase and Individual Follow-up
163 lines

The court resolved Venire Panel 4 cause challenges, denied a hearing-loss challenge, and heard a prospective juror's private medical concern.

sidebar
Stipulation to For-Cause Request
6 lines

The State made a for-cause request, and Tony Henderson stipulated.

Voir Dire
Venire Panel 4: Publicity and Prior-Knowledge Screening
254 lines

Publicity screening led to cause strikes for Badges 122 and 274. Neither party challenged Badge 4045; Badge 192's disposition remained unrecorded.

4 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Proposal to Bring Four Individuals In SeparatelyThe judge proposed removing everyone and bringing in numbers 10, 18, 20, and 22 individually, and both attorneys agreed.
  2. Cause Challenge to Juror with Badge 122The defense sought a cause strike over uncertainty about whether the juror could overcome the interrogation’s negative implication and set aside opinions she may have formed.
  3. Stipulation to a For-Cause ChallengeThe State requested a for-cause challenge, defense counsel stipulated, and the court acknowledged the stipulation.
  4. No Motions From State or DefenseAt the bench, the State and defense each stated they had no motion.
sidebar
No Motions From Either Side
6 lines

The State and defense each reported having no motion when asked by the court.

Procedural
Venire Panel 4: Remaining Pool Confirmation
84 lines

Highlights

Venire Panel 4: Cause-Challenge Phase and Individual Follow-uprulingThe court denied the defense's hearing-loss cause challenge to Juror No. 48 at that time, citing her reported ability to hear with microphones and available hearing assistance.Venire Panel 4: Publicity and Prior-Knowledge ScreeningrulingAfter Badge 122 expressed uncertainty about setting aside negative impressions, the court granted the defense's cause challenge. The State clarified that it had not objected, and the court acknowledged the correction.Venire Panel 4: Publicity and Prior-Knowledge ScreeningrulingBadge 274 said he did not believe he could set aside the suitcase video. The State moved for a cause strike, the defense stipulated, and the court accepted the stipulation.
← Day 1: Jury Selection2024 Criminal TrialDay 3: Jury Selection →