Skip to content
Sarah Boone— Case Archive
2024 Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayTony Hendersonjury_selectionsidebarvoir_direDay 4: Jury Selection - October 17, 2024Six jurors and eight alternates were selected, and the jury was sworn after defense voir dire. The court also clarified self-defense evidence requirements, imposed witness-discovery conditions, and deferred the medical-record discovery hearing until the next morning.
← Day 3: Jury Selection2024 Criminal TrialDay 5 →

Day 4: Jury Selection - October 17, 2024

Self-Defense Rulings, Discovery Disputes, and Jury Selection

Judge Michael Kraynick
24Proceedings
7Pages
0Witnesses
1,492Lines
13Sidebars
Day 4: Jury Selection
Appearing:
Tony Henderson

Six jurors and eight alternates were selected, and the jury was sworn after defense voir dire. The court also clarified self-defense evidence requirements, imposed witness-discovery conditions, and deferred the medical-record discovery hearing until the next morning.

Full day summary

The court allowed the State, without defense objection, to anticipate the battered spouse syndrome defense in its opening statement and case in chief. It required evidence of an overt act reasonably indicating a need for self-defense before victim-character evidence could be introduced, while clarifying that this sequencing restriction did not govern voir dire or opening statements. The defense declined to offer jail records and withdrew its criminal-history item. The court denied a renewed request for a statement of particulars; counsel's competing descriptions of Boone's expert assessment and anticipated evidence were arguments, not testimony. Discovery disputes produced deposition requirements for both sides. Specified defense witnesses could not be called unless first deposed, with the defense paying expedited transcript costs. After a Richardson hearing concerning late-listed State witnesses, the court found any discovery violation inadvertent and trivial, required opportunities for defense depositions, and assigned expedited transcription costs to the State. The separate hearing on newly disclosed medical records remained unfinished and was deferred until the next morning, when an edited version was also due. Defense voir dire addressed reasonable doubt, Boone's right not to testify, self-defense, abusive relationships, and alcohol. The court required several questions to be rephrased. Two prospective jurors were struck for cause by agreement over county residency and exposure to case-related news. After peremptory challenges and backstrikes, both sides accepted six jurors and eight alternates. The jury was sworn at 4:47 p.m., received preliminary instructions, and was directed to return for opening statements at 9:00 a.m. the next morning.

1. Exhibit Objections, Family-Law Records, and Brian Boone Impeachment

The court clarified self-defense evidence limits and allowed the State to anticipate the battered spouse syndrome defense. Defense exhibit objections followed, with the medical-record disclosure hearing and a dispute over Brian Boone’s alleged bias unresolved.

→
Procedural
Session Opening and Counsel Appearances
9 lines
Procedural
Sarah Boone: Oath and Identification
4 lines
Procedural
Self-Defense Motions and Defense Exhibit Objections
274 lines

The court clarified self-defense evidence requirements and addressed disputed defense exhibits. Late medical records prompted a Richardson hearing; the family-law impeachment dispute remained unresolved.

sidebar
Brian Boone Impeachment and Family-Law Records
32 lines

Counsel discussed using family-law records to challenge Brian Boone's alleged bias, potentially revealing Sarah Boone's incarceration and prompting rebuttal evidence.

Highlights

Self-Defense Motions and Defense Exhibit ObjectionsrulingWithout defense objection, the court granted the State's motion allowing its opening statement and case-in-chief evidence to anticipate the battered spouse syndrome defense.Self-Defense Motions and Defense Exhibit ObjectionsrulingThe court required an overt act reasonably indicating a need for self-defense before victim-character evidence could be introduced, and confirmed that the sequencing restriction did not govern voir dire or opening statements.

2. Exhibit-Objection Hearing

The court resolved defense exhibit objections, denied Owens's renewed request for a statement of particulars, and set deposition conditions for defense and late-listed State witnesses. A hearing on newly disclosed medical records was deferred until the next morning.

→
Procedural
Exhibit-Objection Hearing Resumed
137 lines

The court denied renewed particulars, resolved exhibit objections, and required deposition opportunities for late-listed witnesses. A medical-record discovery hearing was deferred until the next morning.

sidebar
Client Consultation and Defense Counsel Attendance
20 lines

Counsel discussed consulting Ms. Boone about potential impeachment of her former husband before his expected testimony and explaining occasional attorney absences for witness coordination.

Highlights

Exhibit-Objection Hearing ResumedrulingThe court deferred the Richardson hearing on the 119 newly disclosed medical-record pages until 9 a.m. the next morning and ordered the defense to provide an edited version of the records it sought to offer by that time.Exhibit-Objection Hearing ResumedrulingFollowing a Richardson hearing on late-listed State witnesses, the court found any discovery violation inadvertent and trivial, noting the defense's possession of related body-camera footage. Before calling those witnesses, the State had to afford defense depositions and pay expedited transcription costs.

3. Panel 5 Qualification Review and Social-Media Cause Challenges

Jury selection on Day 4 addressed news exposure, county residency, and concerns about a prospective juror’s social-media activity. The court struck prospective Jurors Nos. 39 and 45 for cause by stipulation.

→
jury selection
Venire Panel 5 Admission and Qualification Review
40 lines

Juror No. 39 disclosed hearing case-related news, and Juror 45 reported moving to Seminole County. Neither issue was resolved in the recorded exchange.

sidebar
Juror Social Media, Residency, and News Exposure
57 lines

Counsel discussed a prior panel member’s TikTok post, Juror 45’s county residency, and Juror 39’s exposure to news about the case.

Procedural
Open-Court Transition After Cause Strikes
2 lines
sidebar
Juror Restroom Break and Release Logistics
5 lines

The bench discussed a restroom break for the juror in Seat 6, release logistics involving 39 and 45, and a requested microphone check.

Procedural
Panel Recess Admonition and Cause Excusals
30 lines

4. Defense Voir Dire — Presumption of Innocence, Burden of Proof, and Self-Defense

Tony Henderson questioned prospective jurors about the presumption of innocence, Boone’s right not to testify, and self-defense. The court limited several questions and hypotheticals but allowed questions about alcohol’s effects.

→
jury selection
Defense Voir Dire on Jury Service and Presumption of Innocence Tony Henderson
7 lines

Henderson emphasized civic duty and the presumption of innocence. The court temporarily overruled a State objection, then granted Jay's request to approach the bench.

sidebar
Objection to Presumption-of-Innocence Voir Dire
13 lines

Jay objected that Henderson’s news-based setup offered counsel’s views rather than questions to prospective jurors.

Voir Dire
Defense Voir Dire on Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof
263 lines

Henderson explored jurors' views on self-defense, abusive relationships, and alcohol. The court limited three self-defense hypotheticals but allowed alcohol-effects questioning.

4 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Objection to Weapon Self-Defense QuestionJay challenged a self-defense question as vague and confusing, while Henderson said he sought to identify people opposed to any defensive weapon use.
  2. Objection to Height-and-Weight HypotheticalCounsel discussed whether a height-and-weight hypothetical was too close to the case facts and disagreed over Boone's reported height.
  3. Objection Over Overt Acts and Past ConductJay objected that discussion of overt acts and attacking someone based on past conduct raised unclear legal issues under Quintana and approached the case facts.
  4. Objection to Alcohol-Effects Voir DireCounsel disputed whether questions about alcohol’s effects improperly explored case facts or assessed juror attitudes for peremptory challenges.

Highlights

Defense Voir Dire on Presumption of Innocence and Burden of ProofrulingThe court sustained the State's objection to a hypothetical involving past beatings. After Henderson rephrased, Juror No. 13 asked whether a current threat was still necessary; Henderson agreed and explained that past difficulties could be considered alongside an imminent threat.

5. Defense Voir Dire — Alcohol Use, Phone Restrictions, and Juror Attention

Defense voir dire addressed alcohol use, behavior, and accountability. The court also explained phone restrictions and planned digital-evidence access during deliberations.

→
Voir Dire
Defense Voir Dire on Alcohol Use and Behavior
73 lines

Henderson explored alcohol-related attitudes, evidence evaluation, and phone dependence. The court explained deliberation access, and No. 40 indicated discomfort serving.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Juror Phones and Digital Evidence AccessCounsel asked about juror phone rules and preliminary instructions on electronic activity, and the court discussed evidence access during deliberations.
sidebar
Juror Contact and Break Logistics
22 lines

Counsel discussed taking a break away from jurors and reported that some prospective jurors had not understood the last question.

6. Jury Selection, Defendant Participation Colloquy, and Jury Oath

Both sides accepted six jurors and eight alternates, and the jury was sworn at 4:47 p.m.

→
Procedural
Venire Admonition and Selection Recess
165 lines
Procedural
Selection of Six Jurors and Eight Alternates
252 lines

The court finalized six jurors and eight alternates after peremptory challenges and backstrikes. Both sides accepted the panel.

sidebar
Jury Seating and Next-Day Schedule
8 lines

The court and counsel discussed jury seating and swearing-in logistics and the next morning’s schedule around a Richardson issue involving pictures.

colloquy
Defendant Colloquy on Participation in Jury Selection
46 lines
Procedural
Jury Oath Administered at 4:47 p.m.
2 lines

The jury was sworn at 4:47 p.m.

Highlights

Selection of Six Jurors and Eight Alternatesjury eventAfter peremptory challenges and backstrikes, the court announced the six-member jury: Seats 5, 9, 13, 15, 16, and 21.Selection of Six Jurors and Eight Alternatesjury eventThe court finalized eight alternates in Seats 23, 27, 28, 32, 35, 37, 38, and 43. Both sides accepted the panel.

7. Preliminary Jury Instructions and Impeachment/Incarceration-Disclosure Colloquy

The newly sworn jury received preliminary instructions on evidence, the State’s burden of proof, and juror duties. Opening statements were scheduled for the next morning.

→
Procedural
Preliminary Jury Instructions on Trial Procedure and Juror Duties
5 lines

The court instructed jurors on evidence, juror conduct, and the defendant's right to remain silent, then scheduled opening statements for the next morning.

sidebar
Consultation on Brian Boone Impeachment Risks
6 lines

Owens said cross-examining Brian Boone about the dissolution of marriage file could reveal that Ms. Boone had been in custody for four and a half years.

colloquy
Defendant Colloquy on Impeachment and Incarceration Disclosure
20 lines
← Day 3: Jury Selection2024 Criminal TrialDay 5 →