Skip to content
personpersonJulie HarperJulie HarperJulie Harper is a licensed forensic psychologist who owns Northwest Florida Psychological Services in Florida's Panhandle. Her practice includes assessments of competence to stand trial and sanity at the time of an offense.← All People
Expert witnessNorthwest Florida Psychological Services

Julie Harper

Courtroom still of Julie Harper.

Julie Harper is a licensed forensic psychologist who owns Northwest Florida Psychological Services in Florida's Panhandle. Her practice includes assessments of competence to stand trial and sanity at the time of an offense.

489 lines·39 proceedings·26 mentions

About

Julie Harper testified for the defense on Day 8 about her psychological assessment of Sarah Boone, based on nine meetings, three psychological tests, and collateral materials. She diagnosed PTSD and opined that Boone had depression and alcohol use disorder at the time of the offense. She attributed Boone's trauma to intimate-partner violence and opined that Boone had battered spouse syndrome at the February 23, 2020 event.

Harper explained danger cues, coping, and delayed disclosure, and interpreted Boone's sharp speech in reviewed videos as associated with stress. She identified narcissistic traits but did not diagnose a personality disorder, explaining that trauma could better account for the features she observed. She reported valid participation on two screening measures but emphasized that diagnosis did not rest on a single test. The court limited her testimony relaying family-history statements and prior diagnoses.

On cross-examination, William R. Jay challenged her methods and reliance on Boone's account. Harper acknowledged that battered spouse syndrome is not a DSM-5-TR diagnosis and has no required standardized evaluation approach. She identified gaps in her collateral review and acknowledged a changed answer from her deposition about one narcissistic criterion. Harper confirmed that Boone had reported becoming angry, intending to leave Torres in the suitcase for two minutes to convey how choking felt, and believing he could get out himself. She had not asked which words caused that anger. She also clarified that Boone described no physical fight that day and described poking with a bat while Torres was inside the suitcase. The court permitted questions from Aspire records but sustained the objection to questions about Orange County Jail medical records.

On redirect, Harper classified proposed examples of controlling conduct, including threats against dogs, withholding a phone or debit card, and destroying property. She qualified that taking car keys involved control if they were withheld, and that not helping pay bills could amount to withholding or coercive control. These answers addressed general examples rather than identifying who committed those acts. She was excused after both sides agreed to her release.

Trial Record (39)

2024 Trial2024 Criminal TrialOct 14, 2024 – Oct 25, 2024Called by defense

Julie Harper testified for the defense that her assessment supported a PTSD diagnosis and an opinion that Sarah Boone had battered spouse syndrome at the time of the suitcase incident. Cross-examination tested her reliance on Boone's account, gaps in her collateral review, and what she had asked about Boone's reported anger and conduct.

Day 1: Jury Selection

Day 2: Jury Selection

Day 3: Jury Selection

Day 4: Jury Selection

ProceduralExhibit-Objection Hearing ResumedMentioned

Summary

The court denied renewed particulars, resolved exhibit objections, and required deposition opportunities for late-listed witnesses. A medical-record discovery hearing was deferred until the next morning.

Mentioned in this proceeding.

Day 5

Day 6

Day 7

Day 8

DirectJulie Harper — DirectJulie HarperJames Sylivan Owens2highlights189lines spoken

Summary

Julie Harper diagnosed Boone with PTSD and opined that she had battered spouse syndrome at the event. Her direct examination addressed testing, trauma-related behavior, and court-imposed limits on relaying supporting hearsay.

Highlights (2)

testimony highlightHarper reported no indication of feigning on the Miller test and valid participation on the Inventory of Legal Knowledge. She said the PTSD scale supported her broader assessment, not a diagnosis from one test, and attributed Boone's trauma to intimate-partner violence.Open in transcript →
testimony highlightHarper opined that Boone had battered spouse syndrome at the February 23, 2020 event and interpreted her sharp words in reviewed videos as a response to stress and anxiety.Open in transcript →
CrossJulie Harper — CrossJulie HarperWilliam R. Jay1highlight288lines spoken

Summary

Jay challenged Harper's assessment methods, corroboration, and reliance on Boone's account. Harper described limits in her review and follow-up questioning; the court restricted questions about Boone's recorded statement and jail medical records.

Highlights (1)

admissionHarper acknowledged never asking what words had made Boone angry. She confirmed Boone's reported plan to leave Torres in the suitcase for two minutes so he would understand how choking felt, and relayed Boone's explanation that she thought he could get out himself.Open in transcript →
RedirectJulie Harper — RedirectJulie HarperJames Sylivan Owens1highlight10lines spoken

Summary

Julie Harper classified proposed examples of controlling conduct, qualifying her answers about car keys and financial support. She was then excused.

Highlights (1)

testimony highlightHarper classified counsel's proposed examples as forms of control, qualifying that taking car keys involves control if they are withheld and that not helping pay rent and bills could constitute coercive control.Open in transcript →Watch this moment ▶

Day 9

Day 10