Skip to content
Sarah Boone— Case Archive
2024 Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayWilliam R. JayTony HendersonJames Sylivan OwensSarah BooneChelsey KoepsellcrossdirectredirectDay 7 - October 22, 2024The State rested, the court denied judgment of acquittal, and Sarah Boone testified about the suitcase incident and alleged prior violence. Cross-examination addressed her memory, false police accounts, and failure to release Jorge Torres.
← Day 62024 Criminal TrialDay 8 →

Day 7 - October 22, 2024

State Rests, Acquittal Motion Is Denied, and Boone Testifies

Judge Michael Kraynick
18Proceedings
8Pages
2Witnesses
3,274Lines
16Sidebars
Day 7 of 10
Appearing:
William R. Jay Tony Henderson James Sylivan Owens Sarah Boone Chelsey Koepsell

The State rested, the court denied judgment of acquittal, and Sarah Boone testified about the suitcase incident and alleged prior violence. Cross-examination addressed her memory, false police accounts, and failure to release Jorge Torres.

Full day summary

The State rested after Chelsey Koepsell’s cross-examination. Koepsell testified that Boone consented to a phone search and that she planned to arrest Boone before the February 25 interview without disclosing that plan beforehand. She said she gave Miranda warnings before potentially incriminating questions and announced the arrest when the interview ended. The court limited questioning about the detective’s subjective strategy while allowing questions about what Boone had been told. Outside the jury’s presence, the court denied the defense’s motion for judgment of acquittal, finding a prima facie showing of each charged element when viewing the evidence most favorably to the State. Boone chose to testify. She said Torres was already inside the suitcase when she zipped it closed, initially describing the interaction as playful. She alleged that he later threatened her and tried to escape. She admitted shaking the suitcase, striking his protruding hand with a bat, and applying force against the suitcase. She said she believed he could breathe, denied intending to kill him, and described fear when she went upstairs without releasing him. After further argument outside the jury’s presence, the court found an overt act established and allowed reputation, specific-conduct, and battered spouse evidence, subject to the necessary predicates. Boone then alleged prior assaults and threats, described discovering Torres the next morning and attempting CPR, and acknowledged giving a false account of a leg injury to medical personnel and law enforcement. The court admitted Defense Exhibits 2 through 16; photographic enlargements remained demonstrative aids rather than separate evidence. On cross-examination, the State questioned Boone’s chronology, memory gaps, and earlier police accounts. She admitted lying about when drinking began and her involvement in Torres’ injuries. She agreed that Torres had repeatedly said he could not breathe and admitted doing nothing to help him escape before going upstairs. On redirect, she clarified that she struck his protruding hand outside the suitcase and that other injuries resulted from forceful poking while he remained inside.

Video thumbnail9:18:15
Watch →

1. Discovery Review and Requested Conflict Inquiry

The court reviewed discovery concerns, set medical-record exhibit deadlines, and scheduled lunch discussion of the State's request for a potential conflict-of-interest inquiry.

→
Procedural
Morning Appearances and Defendant Identification
15 lines
Procedural
Discovery Review and Preliminary Motions
78 lines

The court clarified recording redactions, set medical-record disclosure deadlines, and deferred the State's potential-conflict motion until lunch.

sidebar
Requested Inquiry Into Defense Funding and Conflicts
27 lines

The State requested an in-camera inquiry into defense funding and a possible story-rights conflict, while Owens denied any deal or conflict.

Procedural
Trial Readiness, Defendant Colloquy, and Jury Return
26 lines

2. Chelsey Koepsell — Cross (Part 4)

Chelsey Koepsell testified about evidence collection, Boone’s consent to a phone search, and her undisclosed plan to arrest Boone before the February 25 interview. The court allowed questions about arrest notice but limited inquiry into the officer’s strategy.

→
Cross
Chelsey Koepsell — Cross Chelsey Koepsell Tony Henderson
366 lines

Chelsey Koepsell faced questions about evidence collection, phone consent, and the planned arrest before Boone's interview. The court allowed arrest-notice questions but limited inquiry into the detective's subjective strategy.

4 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Using a Report to Refresh RecollectionHenderson argued that a report could refresh the witness's memory despite her qualified answer.
  2. Foundation for Refreshing RecollectionThe judge expressed concern about refreshing recollection because a lack of memory was not being established.
  3. Arrest Notice and Interview VoluntarinessCounsel debated whether arrest notice was relevant to the voluntariness of Boone's interview.
  4. Miranda Questions and Statement VoluntarinessCounsel disputed whether Miranda-related questions about officers’ subjective intent were relevant to the jury’s assessment of the defendant’s statement’s voluntariness.

3. State Rests, Judgment-of-Acquittal Motion, and Pretestimony Evidentiary Discussion

The State rested, and the court denied the defense’s motion for judgment of acquittal outside the jury’s presence. Boone chose to testify first, while the court maintained limits on prior-violence evidence.

→
Procedural
Prosecution Rests and Chelsey Koepsell Is Released Subject to Recall
13 lines

The State rested after Chelsey Koepsell was released subject to recall. The jury was excused for a short morning break.

Procedural
Defense Motion for Judgment of Acquittal: Denied
126 lines

The court denied acquittal and maintained the overt-act prerequisite for prior-violence evidence. Boone chose to testify first after a rights colloquy.

sidebar
Exhibit Preparation and Prior Bad-Act Testimony
143 lines

Counsel discussed exhibit preparation, recording redactions, witness depositions, and whether Boone could describe alleged prior violence before establishing an overt act.

Highlights

Prosecution Rests and Chelsey Koepsell Is Released Subject to Recallprocedural actionAsked whether it had any other witnesses, evidence, or testimony, the State announced that it would rest.Defense Motion for Judgment of Acquittal: DeniedrulingAfter competing arguments about dangerousness, depraved mind, and Boone's statements, the court denied judgment of acquittal, finding a prima facie showing of each charged element when viewing the evidence most favorably to the State.

4. Sarah Boone — Direct (Part 1)

Sarah Boone described zipping Jorge Torres inside the suitcase, recording him, and using a bat, while alleging threats and denying intent to kill. The court limited testimony about prior incidents and sent jurors out for argument on the overt-act issue, without ruling here.

→
Direct
Sarah Boone — Direct Sarah Boone James Sylivan Owens
748 lines

Sarah Boone admitted zipping Torres inside the suitcase and using a bat, while alleging threats and explaining her actions as fear-driven. The court limited prior-incident inquiry and arranged an overt-act argument outside the jury's presence.

3 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Limits on Narrative TestimonyCounsel discussed the reason for narrative testimony and breaking it up to allow objections.
  2. Recorded Statements and Prior-Violence EvidenceJay sought to preserve objections to reputation, past violence, and battered spouse syndrome evidence while Owens proposed asking why she made the recorded statements.
  3. Arranging Argument on an Overt ActOwens requested an overt-act determination before moving to other matters, and the court checked whether his presentation about the evening was complete.

Highlights

Sarah Boone — Directtestimony highlightAsked about the interval between the videos, Boone alleged threats and attempts by Torres to escape. She admitted shaking the suitcase, striking his protruding hand with a bat, and pushing the bat against the suitcase until his hand retracted. She acknowledged causing injuries and bruising.

5. Overt-Act Argument and Ruling

Outside the jury's presence, the court found an overt act established and conditionally allowed prior-violence, reputation, and battered spouse evidence before Boone's questioning resumed with the jury present.

→
Procedural
Argument on Overt Act and Admissibility of Prior-Violence Evidence
6 lines

The State sought exclusion of prior-violence and related defense evidence; the defense argued that threats and a hand emerging from the suitcase established an overt act. No ruling was recorded.

Procedural
Ruling on Overt Act, Prior Violence, and Battered Spouse Evidence
150 lines

The court found an overt act established and conditionally allowed prior-violence and battered spouse evidence. It also resolved photographic-exhibit objections and limited duplicate enlargements to demonstrative use.

Highlights

Ruling on Overt Act, Prior Violence, and Battered Spouse EvidencerulingThe court found an overt act established and allowed reputation, specific-conduct, and battered spouse evidence, subject to the necessary predicates.

6. Sarah Boone — Direct (Part 2)

Sarah Boone’s direct testimony continued on Day 7 with her account of finding Jorge in the suitcase and attempting CPR, followed by allegations of prior violence, photographs, and questions about incidents involving a baseball bat.

→
Direct
Sarah Boone — Direct Resumed After Ruling Sarah Boone James Sylivan Owens
691 lines

Sarah Boone described finding Jorge in the suitcase and alleged prior assaults through injury photographs. She admitted a false injury account, discussed her bat use, and denied pushing him down the stairs.

1 sidebar inside this proceeding
  1. Drinking and Prior Violence TestimonyCounsel disputed whether testimony about drinking and alleged prior violence could describe recurring behavior rather than specific incidents.

7. Sarah Boone — Direct (Part 3)

Sarah Boone’s resumed direct testimony addressed her admitted lies to police, prior alleged violence by Jorge, and statements in the suitcase video. She said she feared death or serious injury if he escaped when she used the bat.

→
Direct
Sarah Boone — Direct Resumed Sarah Boone James Sylivan Owens
255 lines

Sarah Boone admitted lying to police, disputed the neighbors' timing of stairwell noises, and linked alleged prior violence and fear to her explanation of using the bat.

3 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Afternoon Break and Officer Witness SchedulingCounsel discussed break timing, estimated examination lengths, asking jurors about staying until 6:00, and availability of two standby officers.
  2. Picture Orientation and Demonstrative AidsJurors reported difficulty viewing displayed pictures, and counsel asked about showing demonstrative aids.
  3. Use of Surnames in CourtCounsel raised a local administrative order concerning surnames.

Highlights

Sarah Boone — Direct Resumed“I lied to the police -- basically, everyone -- because I was extremely fearful of being arrested.”— Sarah BooneAn express admission of dishonesty accompanied by Boone's stated explanation.Sarah Boone — Direct Resumed“I guess you could say that I was trained by fear with him.”— Sarah BooneBoone characterized how prior experiences shaped her perception of danger.

8. Sarah Boone — Cross/Redirect (Part 4)

Sarah Boone faced cross-examination about her chronology, police accounts, and failure to help Jorge Torres escape the suitcase. On redirect, she clarified her testimony about bat contact with his protruding hand, then concluded her testimony.

→
Cross
Sarah Boone — Cross Sarah Boone William R. Jay
510 lines

Jay challenged Boone's memory and police accounts, then examined the suitcase opening and bat use. Boone admitted leaving Torres inside without helping him escape; the court allowed the disputed demonstration.

2 sidebars inside this proceeding
  1. Alcohol-Level Questions and Prior TestimonyOwens objected to alcohol-level questioning and argued that prior testimony described a hangover rather than intoxication.
  2. Suitcase Demonstration and Paper Clip PlacementCounsel objected that the paper clip might be attached differently than on the night in question, potentially affecting how easily the suitcase could be zipped.
Redirect
Sarah Boone — Redirect Sarah Boone James Sylivan Owens
19 lines

Boone clarified that the bat struck Torres' exposed hand outside the suitcase and acknowledged forceful poking that bruised her own hand.

sidebar
Witness Availability, Deferred Motion, and Medical Records
34 lines

Counsel reported no available witnesses, asked about timing for the motion to stay, and requested more time to identify medical record pages for proposed admission.

Procedural
Evening Jury Admonition and Medical-Record Follow-Up
9 lines
Procedural
Sarah Boone Colloquy on Not Pursuing Medical Records
58 lines

Highlights

Sarah Boone — CrossadmissionBoone admitted that her police account of when drinking began was untrue and that her denial of involvement in Torres' injuries was also untrue.Sarah Boone — CrossadmissionBoone disputed Jay's description of hitting Torres with the bat but agreed that the bat contact discussed occurred through the suitcase, not while he was outside it. She said she later made a call and fell asleep, confirmed that Torres remained inside, and admitted doing nothing to help him escape.Sarah Boone — RedirectadmissionBoone confirmed that she hit Torres' hand outside the suitcase, described this as the only bat contact with his body outside it, and agreed that her other forceful poking caused injuries and bruised her own hand.
← Day 62024 Criminal TrialDay 8 →